Why Did the Lindsay Clancy Trial End in a Mistrial? #breakingnews #lindsayclancytrial #crimejunkie

Crime Junkie

  • Sep 4, 2026
  • 26:44
  • Full Episode

After seven days of deliberations, the Lindsay Clancy trial has officially ended in a mistrial. But getting there was anything but straightforward. Jurors twice told the court they were deadlocked. The judge sent them back to deliberate again. Then a new jury note raised questions about whether one holdout juror was properly applying the law. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington fought until the final moments to stop a mistrial from being declared, including an emergency appeal heard by a Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court justice. Ultimately, the jury returned one final time and said they could not reach a unanimous verdict. Now, after a seven-week trial over the deaths of Cora Clancy, Dawson Clancy, and Callan Clancy, the case against their mother, Lindsay Clancy, could start all over again. Breaking news reporter Briana Whitney takes you inside the dramatic final day of the Lindsay Clancy trial in Plymouth County, Massachusetts, explaining exactly how the case reached a mistrial and what could happen next. You'll hear about the jury's repeated notes saying they were unable to reach a unanimous decision, the judge's decision to issue a Rodriguez charge and send jurors back to continue deliberating, the unusual note alleging that one juror was unable to follow the law surrounding reasonable doubt, why the courtroom believed the jury may have been split 11–1, Kevin Reddington's argument that the holdout juror had not been truthful with the court, the emergency effort to stop the mistrial from being declared, the last-minute hearing before a Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court justice, and the moment the jury finally returned to the courtroom and the mistrial became official. Briana also breaks down what happened outside the courthouse after the trial ended. Plymouth County District Attorney Timothy Cruz told reporters that his focus remains on Lindsay's three children, arguing that Cora, Dawson, and Callan Clancy are the victims whose lives should remain at the center of the case. Kevin Reddington offered a very different perspective, saying he was proud to represent Lindsay Clancy, describing her as a brave woman who continues to grieve her children. He also sharply criticized the holdout juror and what happened during deliberations. But there is still a major question neither side can answer: What was actually happening inside that jury room? To understand that, Briana sits down with Diana Schwartz, who served as Juror #6 in the Jodi Arias trial in Maricopa County, Arizona. The Jodi Arias case became one of the most closely watched trials in the country after Arias was convicted in May 2013 of murdering Travis Alexander at his home in Mesa, Arizona, on June 4, 2008. Diana knows firsthand what it's like to deliberate in an extraordinarily high-profile and emotionally difficult case. She talks with Briana about what really happens when jurors disagree behind closed doors, the pressure of deliberating when the rest of the country is watching, how jurors handle strong personalities and opposing interpretations of evidence, what it feels like when a jury cannot reach consensus, how she emotionally processed the evidence she heard during the Jodi Arias trial, and what happens to jurors after the trial ends and they return to their everyday lives. Her experience offers a rare perspective on what the Lindsay Clancy jurors may have been navigating during seven days of deliberations. A mistrial is not an acquittal. Prosecutors must now decide how they want to proceed, including whether to retry Lindsay Clancy. A status hearing is scheduled for September 29, 2026. The prospect of another trial also raises a difficult question after weeks of testimony, extensive news coverage, and enormous online discussion surrounding this case: How do you find another impartial jury?

Follow Crime Junkie: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/crimejunkiepodcast Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CrimeJunkiePodcast/ Crime Junkie is created and hosted by Ashley Flowers.

Text Ashley to chat about this episode and more: https://my.community.com/ashleyflowers?t=Hi%20Ashley%21

About Ashley Flowers Ashley Flowers is the top female podcaster in the U.S. and the host of Crime Junkie, the #1 podcast among women and the #1 true crime podcast globally. As the Founder of Audiochuck, she has built a top-tier podcast production company that has garnered over 2.6 billion downloads, captivating audiences with its gripping storytelling through 10+ chart topping podcasts. Ashley and her team are dedicated to creating responsible true crime content that respects victims and their families.

Follow Ashley: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ASHLEYFLOWERS/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@ashleyflowerscrimejunkie

Purchase Ashley’s highly anticipated second novel, The Missing Half now! | https://ashleyflowers.com/books

Brief Summary

The Lindsy Clansancy trial ended in a mistrial due to a deadlocked jury, raising questions about mental health and justice.

Key points

  • Mistrial Declared in Clansancy Case. After days of deadlock, the jury could not reach a unanimous decision, leading to a mistrial.
  • Prosecutor's Passionate Statement. District Attorney Timothy Cruz emphasizes the need for justice for the victims.
  • Defense Attorney's Reaction. Kevin Readington expresses pride in his client and frustration with the holdout juror.
  • The Weight of Public Scrutiny. Jurors face intense public scrutiny during high-profile trials, impacting their deliberation process.
  • The Emotional Toll on Jurors. The jurors' experience is described as painstaking, highlighting the emotional burden they carry.
  • The Future of Lindsay Clancy's Trial. Questions arise about the next steps for Lindsay Clancy after a mistrial is declared.

Tension

60/ 100Some tension

More from Crime Junkie

Solve the Crime

Read a real case one clue at a time, then see how your call held up against the investigators.

Start a Case