The Murder of Shanti Cooper | Millionaire Murders | Forensic Files

[theme music] Delaney Park is a beautiful upper-class, if you will, neighborhood with very large homes,
some of them even mansions. Some of the homes have very nice views of downtown Orlando.
It's very affluent and very low crime rates. More so well-to-do people that live in these residences.
On April 24th of 2018, I was on-call for Orlando Police as a homicide investigator.
And the 911 call came in that afternoon by David Tronnes advising that he had found his wife
in the bathtub, unresponsive. So the call initially came in on 911 as a sick or injured person in distress,
in need of medical attention. Patrol officers responded. And based on what they observed at the scene
and what the fire department observed, they contacted our homicide unit. And they felt that the homicide unit needed
to respond and observe her injuries and then make a determination if this was an accidental death,
if this was a natural death, if this was a suicidal death, or if this was a murder.
I knew that Teresa was up as lead investigator, so I walked over to her desk and told her, hey, there's a call,
and I want to go with you on this investigation. It wasn't normal for us to have, you know,
a potential homicide or a potential suicide in this type of a neighborhood. So when we arrived at the scene, it was late afternoon.
The house itself was very large. It seemed to be very well taken care of. It was a stunning home, very expensive, in a very exclusive
neighborhood of Delaney Park. Beautiful when they purchased it. To the west of the home and the garage apartment
was their backyard and the pool area and a cabana area, so a very large piece of property for this neighborhood.
The first thing I noticed when we got out of the car were these gargoyles. It just seemed a little ominous.
My supervisor was there, our Sergeant in homicide was there, and our crime scene personnel.
They were directing us to the apartment that was above the garage. I recall that both officers had
said they had spoken to David Tronnes and that he found her in the bathtub. You know, she was unconscious and that he had found
her in rose-colored water. He felt that she had slipped and fallen in the bathtub.
He pulled her out of the water to do CPR on her. When I first saw Shanti, she was on the floor, on the carpet,
in between her bed and her desk. Yet the first thing we noticed is she didn't appear wet.
Her skin didn't appear pruned. Her clothing did not appear-- maybe damp but not wet.
And the flooring didn't appear wet. Shanti had clear injuries on her face. Her left eye was swollen, black and blue.
You could see blood in her hair. Her injuries were inconsistent with a slip and fall.
We had observed a diamond earring on her nightstand. Her left earring was still in her ear
where the most trauma was to her face. Her right earring was removed. BARBARA SHARP (VOICEOVER): And we noticed that she
wasn't wearing a wedding ring. It was a very expensive piece of jewelry. It's approximately a $15,000 ring.
And it wasn't on her hand when we observed her. But when I asked David Tronnes about her jewelry,
I said, what did she have on today? And he indicated her wedding ring and her earrings.
So I'm trying to figure out, is this a random burglary, and she was attacked? Someone walked in and didn't know she was there, perhaps,
or whoever entered the home to harm her possibly had access. There didn't appear to be any signs of forced entry.
Now, it doesn't mean that there's not still a burglary. The door could have been unlocked,
and somebody could have easily walked in. But there weren't any signs of forced entry there.
From this point forward, although it's concerning to us that, you know, we weren't able to resolve it straight away,
it is also our job to not have tunnel vision and to keep an open mind. David told us that he had walked the dog
and that when he came back, he typically didn't interact with Shanti during the day
while she was working. He didn't have any conversation with her during the day. DAVID TRONNES: Hi, family.
So we had learned that she had a young son, Jackson Cooper, who she had shared custody with, who would sometimes stay
with her at this residence. It was only this late afternoon, and it was because he wanted
to know if he should go pick up Jackson from school or if she was going to do it.
And when he called up to her, I guess she didn't respond. And he went upstairs, and that's when
he found her in the bathtub. We typically don't call the medical examiner until we are ready for them to recover the body from the scene.
But in this particular case, Teresa, because she's so experienced, knew that there
might be something more. She wanted them to look. And we're not allowed to touch the body.
So medical examiner investigator felt her clothing and said it was damp but not soaked.
Her hair was somewhat damp, yet she appeared to have her night clothes on. So he was able to open her eyelids,
and then I observed the trauma and the petechiae on the whites of her eyes. Having a background in domestic violence,
I had observed petechiae quite a bit as it relates to strangulation. And it's just the small blood vessels in the eyes that burst
and cause red dots or hematoma. The medical examiner agreed with us that this did
not seem like a slip and fall. Absolutely. So, having noted those items, we asked Mr. Tronnes
if he would go to the station voluntarily and be interviewed, and he agreed to do that, while we were observing the scene.
We knew that if she'd been found in a tub full of water, at least the tub should be wet, though there was no water to be
seen in the bathroom at all. No water on the floor, no water on the carpet. Everything was dried, which would take
some time for that to occur. So obviously, we wanted to document the dry, diluted blood on the shower
walls and dry, diluted blood on the tub. I wanted them to obtain latent prints from anywhere
on the surface of that tub that they could find any latent prints. So we take all the necessary information down at the scene.
Detective Sharp and I go back to the station to start the search warrant and then interview David Tronnes.
It was Shanti's day to pick up Shanti's son, Jackson, at school. And because she didn't arrive there that day,
the school called his father, and he came and picked up Jackson. I was home that day, so when I got that call,
I knew in an instant something was wrong. She would never not pick him up or at least not
communicate with me. I called David's phone, and I got his voicemail, and I was already driving to the school, and I was angry.
And then I made the biggest mistake of my life, and I drove to their house, which I wish I never had done.
Jim turned down the street and saw police cars everywhere. The entire time, Jackson was in the car with Jim.
I was just praying that was somebody else's house before I got to the end of the block.
TERESA SPRAGUE (VOICEOVER): David Tronnes, Shanti's husband, was taken to Orlando Police by a patrol officer voluntarily.
POLICE OFFICER: India 4597. Thank you. And we did not see him until we went in to interview
him between 8:00 and 9:00 PM. And then obviously let him know what his rights were before speaking with us.
So the initial interview began with Detective Sprague speaking to David and just getting a background
on their relationship. He never expressed anything other than it was just a blissful marriage.
Mr. Tronnes had divorced a year earlier from his first wife and was very well off and, at 49, 50 years old,
was basically early retired and looking for love again and looking to relocate him
and his mother to Orlando. David portrayed that he was independently wealthy and had
millions of dollars and was very successful through both a business career and then
received a large inheritance. BARBARA SHARP: They met on one of the dating online sites
and that he was living in Minnesota at the time. They chatted back and forth, would frequently fly back
and forth to see each other. And that's when she, you know, was smitten, was swept off her feet by Mr. Tronnes.
She would visit him in Minnesota. He would come down to Florida. And they were going, you know, every few weeks
until, ultimately, I guess, the decision was made he was going to move to Florida.
He purchased the home in Delaney Park with cash, and he put it in a trust with him and his mother's name
on the trust. BARBARA SHARP: He moved in with Shanti and her son Jackson, who was there part-time.
He mentioned to us that they were trying to renovate this house for quite some time.
TERESA SPRAGUE (VOICEOVER): And the main residence was completely uninhabitable.
It was under complete renovation. So for multiple years, David and Shanti and Shanti's son
were required to live in a loft over a garage. He had offered that they were getting
along well, that they had a vision for the renovation. David spoke very highly of Shanti, that she was beautiful,
but she was also very intelligent. So what we want to focus on is the timeline. It's just fact finding.
It's evidence gathering. So it's an interview. It's not an interrogation. Now, when you're doing the timeline,
you're going to listen to what Mr. Tronnes tells you. He slept in the garage on a couch.
Did not sleep with Shanti in the upstairs loft on Monday night. He says he saw her again when she came downstairs
between 8:00 and 9:00. And I said, did anyone see you? And he said, no. Did you take a toll road?
And he took backroads to the dog park. David then said that he didn't see Shanti until almost 3
o'clock that day, and then that Shanti was tied up in business meetings the entire day.
And that it wasn't until, you know, sometime after 3:00 when it had to be decided who was going
to get Jackson from school, that he'd go up there and then ultimately find her, as he described, sort of partially
submerged in a bathtub. Obviously, we treated him as a witness who had found his wife
deceased in their home. So it makes sense that we want to know everything there is to know about them.
But also, did she have any problems with anyone else? Was she having problems with people she had dated?
Was she having problems with her ex-husband? BARBARA SHARP: I know a lot of people
sometimes feel like, you know, why are you always looking at the ex-husband? Well, statistically, a lot of times
it is the ex-husband or the ex-wife, if you will, that has caused, you know, the death of somebody.
They wanted to get a recorded statement right then and there. We wanted to know everything there was to know
about his marriage to Shanti-- when they met, their problems in the marriage, why they divorced.
We met on New Year's Eve, I believe, 1999 or 2000 at a club in South Beach. She came in the room, and you just knew she was there.
She just had this confidence about her and presence that it affected you when you were in the room with her.
And it was wonderful. And after a year, we got engaged, and then we got married in 2002.
That was quite a journey to have a son together because that was something we both wanted.
She was a very good mom, had a great personality. We loved going to amusement parks.
We did that a lot. We loved going out, you know, for walks, just doing a bunch of stuff like that.
You know, simple things. It was the simple things that mattered. We lived on a farm.
She traveled for her job. So when she was away, I took care of the farm and Jackson.
She worked in finance, which she did love. She stayed away for work a little more than usual.
And then the times that she was home, she wanted to work more. So she became a little detached from us.
BARBARA SHARP: And then, like so many marriages do, they started to kind of go their separate ways.
Shanti eventually had an extramarital affair, which ended their relationship. It was a very difficult divorce.
It dragged out for years. I was very hurt. We at least kept a united front, you know, in front of Jackson
for the good of him and raising him as best we could. I was trying to move on with my life.
And she had already moved on with hers with David. I didn't care about his relationship with her
as long as Jackson was safe around him. And as long as my son is safe with him, then him and I would not have a problem.
You know, strangely, when we first met with Jim Cooper, the first thing he said to us is, where is her husband?
And he seemed very, very concerned. David Tronnes had left for the day and came home and found his wife deceased in the bathtub.
RYAN VESCIO (VOICEOVER): Shanti was autopsied the next morning on April 25. MICHAEL SMITH: The medical examiner
determined that she was killed by blunt force trauma as well as strangulation. She had bruising on both sides of her face.
One of her ears was pulled to the point it looked like it was almost pulled from her head.
I mean, it was a very violent attack. We knew she wasn't sexually assaulted, and we knew there wasn't foreign DNA inside of her.
So we knew we weren't looking for perhaps a rapist. And then Shanti laid there alive,
likely unconscious or semi-conscious for a period of time. It could have been as little as 10 minutes.
It could have been as long as an hour before Shanti's life was ended through strangulation.
Of keen interest to me was the fact that she did not drown, and there were no water in her lungs,
although her husband told a story of finding her face down in a bathtub. [music playing]
RYAN VESCIO: The detectives knew by the next day that Shanti's ex-husband, Jim, was at work during the day
and at home with their son, Jackson. And he gave us his timeline of that day. Jim Cooper drove Jackson to school,
pulled video from the school to prove that happened, that he had been at lunch with several co-workers and so forth.
So we were able to eliminate Mr. Cooper. RYAN VESCIO: And at that point, Jim could focus on supporting his young son, Jackson,
who had just lost his mother. And Shanti's family and close friends really came together as a community,
all focused on Jackson-- to support him, to allow him to grieve, to help him process the worst thing that could happen to a young child.
The first thing we did once the warrant was signed to search the home is we directed our searchers and our crime scene
personnel to secure the most obvious evidence, which was around her body because of how
much blood was on the mattress pad she was laying on. It appeared to be underneath of Shanti on the carpet itself.
Teresa and I began kind of getting an idea in our head of, was this making sense, or was it maybe more to this?
We had two areas of the carpet that had blood soaked down through the carpet, so she'd been moved at least twice.
So now we see that there's probably been movement of her body from the tub, two different areas on the carpet.
So all of the movement seemed odd. And she appeared to be already in rigor mortis.
It just did not line up to me. TERESA SPRAGUE: David brings up something also that I thought was telling.
He indicates to us, without us asking, that they had been intimate on Saturday night and again on Sunday
because Jackson had stayed the night with a friend. We hadn't asked for that information, but he offered it.
He also offered that she was menstruating at the time. BARBARA SHARP: We took that bed apart and transported the bed
to our crime scene facility and found that there was a significant amount of blood on that bed.
But we suspected that there was a cleanup. We discovered that Shanti's blood was found on the inside bed rail on the side of the bed
where she was ultimately found through DNA analysis. Because that bed rail blood was cleaned up,
however, that also told us that there was somebody else involved at the scene. TERESA SPRAGUE: So we have to go through the timeline
of her life-- when she was last seen alive and by whom, by other people in other ways--
through her cell phone, through neighbors, through her son, through her ex-husband.
When did people last see Shanti alive? And what is her day-to-day routine? We knew Jackson had been picked up from Shanti Monday
around 5:00 PM and that Shanti had walked Jackson down to Jim's car. So she was alive Monday at 5:00 PM.
She also spoke to Jackson that night and said goodnight to him on the phone between
8:00 and 8:30 Monday night. From there, it's getting into her cell phone, getting into her computer.
She was on her phone for work constantly. She was extremely responsive because she worked
from home and for herself. TERESA SPRAGUE: There was no sign of life in her cellular communication, in her text message
communication, in her business communication whatsoever past Monday night. Computer forensics and phone forensics showed that
Shanti's phone stopped moving at about 11:30 the night before she had passed. So according to Mr. Tronnes, Shanti is alive on Tuesday
morning. And he sees her twice before he leaves the residence to go to the dog park.
On David's phone, it showed no movement, no activity, even though he said he had done all of these things
on this particular day, which is very unusual. So a lot of the pieces were starting to fall in place,
but we still had a lot of questions. TERESA SPRAGUE: We interviewed people in Minnesota that knew David.
We interviewed his ex-wife. She said she didn't believe that he was responsible for Shanti's
death and that that did not, you know, coexist with the man she lived with and was married to for 14 years.
At one point in time, after we initially spoke to David, he said he believed that somebody had broken
into the garage apartment on that day and that there was money missing. We knew her wedding ring wasn't there.
He seemed to be very proud of her wedding ring, that it was, you know, a diamond and very expensive,
that he described. We went on an all-out search for that ring and never found it in the home.
So that became concerning to us. BARBARA SHARP: David explained to us, the one person
that he described that he had seen in the neighborhood, who he described looking like Woody Harrelson--
--who's an actor, indicating that this person, you know, might be the possible suspect.
I reached out to Officer Wilson, who was initially on the scene, who's worked this area
for a number of years. And I asked Officer Wilson, you know, they're saying that there's this homeless guy
in the neighborhood who allegedly looks like Woody Harrelson. And he said, I know exactly who you're talking about.
And, you know, he's very standoffish. He's very skittish around people. I think he might have, you know, schizophrenia
or something like that. So now we have to find him. So the patrol officers, one night
in the middle of the night, found him, you know, down on Orange Avenue pretty far away from the scene.
That person was interviewed. We had no reason to believe that person had any involvement
in Shanti's death whatsoever. The very moment that I saw the first set of crime scene photos,
I noticed this was not a break-in. There were no signs of forced entry on the doors.
There were no broken locks. There were no broken windows, open windows. MICHAEL SMITH: There was cash around that was, you know, left.
There was electronics. There were credit cards, you know, cell phones, laptops, all that sort of thing.
There was nothing overturned. There was no furniture overturned like there was a struggle between two people
or that she had fought. And there was no DNA that was determined to not be Jackson's-- the son--
David Tronnes', or Shanti's. Same with fingerprints. There were fingerprints all over the bathroom,
but there was no stranger's fingerprints. And at that point in time, it became a war of wills between the detectives trying
to get a confession and David trying to create a story that would cover up his responsibility.
We decided we needed to confront David and what we felt at that point were lies.
And so at that point, it turned into more of an interrogation. The level of frustration is epic, seeing him really close,
like maybe leaning in, and body language tells me a lot from someone. There were several times when David, I think,
was very close to saying what happened, and he just regrouped. Detective Sharp and I had to make the very difficult decision
to release Mr. Tronnes. David Tronnes was sometimes emotional and sometimes not,
sometimes inconsolable and couldn't talk and other times very calm. We observed he never once shed a tear for her.
Interviewing Jim Cooper and David Tronnes, there was a definite difference in their personalities
and how they were reacting to the death of a loved one-- a current wife and an ex-wife.
Jim Cooper was distraught and angry, which, to me, says an awful lot about kind of where
you lie in that investigation. As the investigation went into the summer, we knew that there was more out there
and really had to focus into backgrounds-- into David's life, Shanti's life, their life.
Where did they come from? What sort of issues did they face? And at the same time, we're interviewing, you know,
people that walk through the neighborhood. We're interviewing the neighbors that knew
them and interacted with them. So imagine our surprise when we're interviewing the neighbors
who had been in conversation with an employee at a gay man's bathhouse or gym that had told them
that David had been a member of this facility for 18 months. We discovered that David frequented a same-sex bathhouse
about two miles down the road from their home, making over 65 visits. A men's-only facility for gay and bisexual men to have sexual
relations with other men. And days before her murder, he had been there. So we interviewed the employees there.
And one of them that we interviewed had seen him in, you know, sexual contact with two different men on two separate occasions.
Was David living a second life that maybe Shanti didn't know about or maybe that Shanti had just found out about
and was not happy about? They'd been married a little over a year at this time. And so he did paint a very incredible
picture of their marriage. We think, you know, from a woman's standpoint would be
causing some problems for them. As the investigation grew through the first and second month, we began a deep financial analysis.
So Shanti had indicated to some of her friends, you know, he's claiming to be a millionaire,
but he won't pay for anything. He was spending money early on when they were dating
and not so much once they started living together. It seemed to change. And he didn't work the entire time that he knew Shanti.
Her dad, her biological father, his family owned an apartment complex in India. He sold it, and he gave all that money to Shanti to invest.
And the financial picture that we developed quickly was one where Shanti was wildly successful.
In fact, paying herself $50,000 a month out of her business that she built from the ground up and operated.
Meanwhile, David was making no income, not contributing financially to the home.
He convinced Shanti that he could be his own contractor. BARBARA SHARP: I remember looking at the main house,
and you could see inside, and it was basically a shell. There was no walls. There was no floors.
The whole house had been gutted. TERESA SPRAGUE: And the more demolition and the more they
dove into the renovation, the worse it got. And it had gone on for so long that her renovation
budget that she anticipated was now, you know, hundreds of thousands of dollars to--
in order to fix the problem. So it ended up where her contribution was now going to be
perhaps $200,000 or $300,000, and she was very concerned about that. When we first moved into the Delaney Park house,
she was very happy. But as time went on, with all the renovations, they started to fight a little more.
Kind of changed my opinion of him. I tried to keep my distance from him because he lashed out a lot.
What David portrayed and what really happened were absolute opposites. David wanted others to believe that he was the provider.
But when we looked at what the true story was, Shanti was the provider who made hundreds of thousands of dollars
a year that she was able to contribute. Shanti had to be the breadwinner for them
and to bring that type of a lifestyle for David because David wasn't bringing anything to the table
to help support that. One of the things that we discovered was that David had an entire pot of money of his own
to the side that we don't believe that Shanti ever knew about, and having multiple accounts
with hundreds of thousands of dollars that he did not want to contribute. David, upon buying the house, put ownership of the house
in a trust for which him and his mother were beneficiaries but Shanti had no ownership interest in.
This is something that greatly disturbed and bothered Shanti as she realized that she was making investments
into a property that if something went south with her and David's relationship, she would have
no right to recover the monies. TERESA SPRAGUE: Shanti had made quite a few requests
for her name to be put on the trust along with David and his mother. There were either denials or delays in doing so.
One item that Shanti kept within her office space were to-do lists like all of us do.
And through list and list and list, Shanti repeatedly wrote the note, the follow-up,
get my name on the house, get my name on the house, a number of times over a period
of months and years. After she divorced Jim, all of her beneficiaries on every account were 100% her son, Jackson.
Shanti had had a life insurance policy with-- and actually, up until the year before,
Jackson was the beneficiary. And Dave forged her signature on life insurance policies
and other things, changing Jackson as the beneficiary to him-- Which she would never do.
--which she would never do. And that was a $350,000 policy. So, you know, you're looking at, with the life insurance
and $800,000 in the accounts, over $1 million, you know, that David would stand to control.
He had just made a request for the $350,000 life insurance policy on Shanti. So they had indicated to me that he was making a request
for the funds to be disbursed. And they had called me, and I had requested that they
not disburse those funds. I made the decision that it was time to bring the case to the grand jury.
The evidence only pointed to David. I think, on that particular day, they got into an argument,
and it was either over the renovation, her being on the deed, or even possibly her finding out about David's
other life, if you will, being a member of this Orlando men's health club. MICHAEL SMITH: We do not believe that the attack started,
you know, in the tub. We think it happened, you know, sort of next to the bed and nightstand.
And we think it happened either as she was taking out an earring to go to bed or maybe putting an earring back on to, you know,
get ready for her day because she had a nice pair of diamond earrings. And one was found in her ear, and one
was found in the nightstand. But there was, you know, blood that had dripped down
through the side of the bed. Maybe he struck her in the head and then, you know, continued to attack her there and then choked her
and then maybe tried to clean some of the blood and evidence off, you know, in the bathtub after.
I think he made sure that he would inherit the house. I think he made sure that all of the finances would come to him.
I don't know if he ever loved Shanti or if she was a means to an end. We were able to arrest him on August 29th of 2018.
But when they pulled up and asked him to come off the porch, and he appeared almost relieved, almost like he was expecting us.
We conducted a search warrant at his mother's house, which was where he was living at the time.
And in the bedroom that David was staying in, there was a suitcase on the floor with various items.
And in that suitcase was Shanti's wedding ring. We had been looking for it for 4 and 1/2 months,
and we had, you know, pictures from Facebook. We knew the moment we saw that ring, that
was the missing wedding ring. So that gave, you know, the implication that this really
was extremely cold-blooded. I mean, what that would show, I think, is that he pulled it off of her dead hand.
It took 5 and 1/2 years to bring it to trial. And the journey to trial took a long and winding road
through the COVID pandemic and the delays associated with that, through David Tronnes trying to fake mental illness
and being sent to the psychiatric hospital for observation and determination that, in fact, his reported symptoms of schizophrenia
were fictitious. I wanted to introduce the jurors to, you know, an overview of what they're going to hear in the case.
So I just started back, you know, at the beginning of their relationship-- how they met, how
he ended up in Florida, how they ended up in this house together with her son, how it was kind of destroyed,
the state of their marriage at the time that the murder happened, the violent nature
of how she was killed, how this was no accident. One of the best witnesses in this case, in fact,
were the financial records-- David immediately wanting to receive hundreds of thousands
of dollars in life insurance after Shanti's death. When you look at David starting to change bank accounts
and move money, taking the ownership of the home into his own name, all those items
point that this could have been a crime of financial motivation. I couldn't look at him because if I did,
I was afraid I was going to do something. Just the lies that he told about me that Jackson had to hear.
TERESA SPRAGUE: We hope at the end of all of this testimony that the jury sees what we see.
There wasn't really a defense offered. It was more of an attack on the police department
and the detectives and the investigation. So you never know what a jury is going to do because you can't get
your whole story out in trial. And they were out several hours as we anticipated they would be.
The jury comes back. They find him guilty-- first-degree murder. He will spend the rest of his life
in prison where he will die. Our goal always from day one was to get justice not only for Shanti but to get justice
for Jackson and her family. When you meet this little boy at eight years old, he was exceptional.
And then to see him at trial at 14 years old, just an extraordinary young man. There's a few photos back then.
It's nice looking back to see how it was, like, my mom and I sitting on the little beachside on the lake,
having a good time. Most of my impact statement was just saying about who she was
and how great of a person she was and how that was taken away from my family. I just wanted to let the judge know what he took from us.
And the only thing I can think of is that he's evil. When we left the courtroom, I was hugging Jackson.
I said, so high school is next. And then what? Are you going to go to college? And he said, I'm going to be a police officer.
And I said, you know, Jackson, you've been through so much. Just go be happy. Your mom would want you to be happy.
And he said, I'm going to help other people like all of you helped my mom. And I said, she'd be very proud of you.
[theme music]

In 2018, Shanti Cooper was murdered in Orlando, Florida by her husband David Tronnes, who staged her death as an accidental fall. Motivated by greed, Tronnes sought to benefit from life insurance and their shared home

Greed, jealousy, revenge, lust, anger — any and all are motives for murder. When there's cash involved, the stakes are even higher. Explore a new case in each episode of Millionaire Murders.

Brief Summary

The episode details the investigation and trial of David Tronnes for the murder of his wife Shanti, revealing financial motives and inconsistencies in his story.

Key points

A Shocking Discovery. David Tronnes finds his wife unresponsive in the bathtub, leading to a homicide investigation.
Inconsistent Evidence. Detectives observe that Shanti's injuries do not match David's account of a slip and fall.
A Mother's Tragic Loss. Shanti's family and friends rally to support her young son, Jackson, after her death.
A Tense Investigation. The investigation reveals troubling inconsistencies in David's story and the crime scene.
David's Double Life. Investigators uncover David's secret visits to a men's bathhouse, raising questions about his marriage.
Financial Motives Revealed. The investigation reveals David's financial deception, including hidden accounts and life insurance policies.

Episode highlights

Episode quotes

It just seemed a little ominous.

Investigator's first impression of the scene with gargoyles.

3:50WatchMar 14, 2025

Tension

85/ 100High tension

More from True Crime Files

Solve the Crime

Read a real case one clue at a time, then see how your call held up against the investigators.