Santa Rosa Murders ////// Missing Girls | Forensic Files

TV's number one drama, High Potential, returns with star Caitlyn Olsen as the crimesolving single mom with an IQ of
160. Every week, Morgan uses her unconventional style and brilliance to crack LAPD's most perplexing cases. It's
the perfect blend of humor and mystery. She's breaking the mold without breaking
a nail. New episodes of High Potential Tuesdays 10:9 central on ABC and stream on Hulu.
Hey, it's Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile. Now, I was looking for fun ways to tell you that Mint's offer of
unlimited premium wireless for $15 a month is back. So, I thought it would be fun if we made $15 bills, but it turns
out that's very illegal. Uh, so there goes my big idea for the commercial. Give it a try at mintmobile.com/switch.
>> Upront payment of $45 for three month plan equivalent to $15 per month required. New customer offer for first
three months only. Speed slow after 35 gigabytes of networks busy. Taxes and fees extra. Cementmobile.com.
[Music] Heat. Heat. [Music] [Music] Close [Music] [Music] your eyes in 20125 and imagine if you will, the idea of
routinely relying upon a complete and total stranger to give give you a ride to school, work, or any other
destination. Well, in a sense, we already do that with the advent of ride share services
such as Uber and Lyft, but those companies at minimum have some type of guard rails built into their business
model, however weak they may be in reality. In the 1970s, there were no apps or cell phones or any services such
as these. So, cashstrapped individuals, primarily students and young people, frequently
relied upon another age-old method to get where they needed to go. Hitchhiking. In the United States,
hitchhiking first entered the zeitgeist in the late 1920s due to the economic hardships of the
Great Depression. It remained a common mode of transportation in the 30s and 40s. After
World War II, thumbming a ride became an economical means for soldiers to return
to their loved ones, as well as an opportunity for motorists to perform a patriotic duty by giving them a lift.
The youth movement in the 1960s saw a revival of this mode of transportation. The 1970s would emerge as the golden era
of hitchhiking in the United States with students, workers, travelers, and sometimes even minors seeking the
cheapest mode of transportation by using their thumb to catch a ride. Despite warnings from parents, police,
and other authority figures, the hitchhiking is not always safe and in fact can be very dangerous, folks,
especially young ones, were regularly getting into a vehicle that they may have never seen before, driven by
someone that they have never met. This included young women and girls who felt the risk of hitching a ride to be very
low and they were willing to take that chance. It could never happen to me. However, faces on milk cartons and the
stranger danger years of the 1980s resulted in a sharp decline in hitchhiking. Increased media spread of legitimate
information and statistics had fully opened our eyes to the dangers and high-risk status of hitchhiking.
Thankfully, the availability of affordable alternatives such as buses, trains, and more recently ride share
services. Today, the need for this very risky mode of transportation is almost non-existent.
Hitchhiking, thumbming or hitching. It's not just getting a ride, but places one
in the company of another, usually a stranger, and it is their home field advantage,
and you are well within striking distance. The ride is usually, but not always, free. Some, in fact, far too
many, and perhaps many more than we may ever know, have paid the ultimate price for a ride. Between 1972 and 1973, in
Santa Rosa, California, a predator who had earned the name the Hitchhiker Killer or the Soma Co-ed Killer claimed
the lives of at least seven female victims, with many more suspected. Six of the bodies were recovered and
identified and one remains missing still. Additionally, an eighth presumed victim,
unidentified and known only as Jane Doe, is thought to be related to the case. Law enforcement and media to this day
refer to the series of homicides as the Santa Rosa Hitchhiker murders. This is True Crime Garage.
[Music] [Music] In the early 1970s in Soma County, California, young women and girls were
turning up dead. Homicide victims discarded by the killer or killers, as detectives put it, like trash. Many of
the crimes were similar in both nature and victimology. Among the victims, all of the women were last seen hitchhiking
in and around Santa Rosa and Soma County. Soma County, located in the Bay Area of Northern California, is situated
on the coastline about 55 miles north of San Francisco. The prosperous and vibrant city of Santa Rosa serves as the
county seat and it is the largest city with 25% of the county's population residing there. But back in the early
and mid70s, think medium to large suburb, 50 to 55,000 people. The city of Santa Rosa was undergoing transformative
changes thanks to urban redevelopment and was surrounded by classic small town America. The county was comprised of
rural municipalities, picturesque hills, coastal towns, and ocean views to the west and vineyards to the east, but also
remote and quiet wooded areas. The 1970s saw a significant rise in violent crimes
such as assault, rape, and murder. The decade also has the dubious distinction of being at the forefront of the quote
golden age of serial killers. December 28th, 1972, two teenage boys out on a hiking adventure on a Thursday afternoon
made a gruesome discovery, finding the remains of at least two bodies. Bones and two skulls were found about 60 feet
off of a narrow two-lane county road down a steep embankment in a heavy brush area. The teens promptly went to the
home of the oldest boy and his father called the coroner's office. The teens were hiking France Valley. So they
parked their vehicle, went for the hike. It was on the return to the parked vehicle that one of them spotted the
remains. This is near the bottom of a steep embankment at a spot just off of France Valley Road that is 2.2 mi north
of Porter Creek Road. There are houses there now, but still very spread out. Even looking at a map today, one can see
why this is a great location for hiking and a good spot for placing something that you don't want to be found or at
least not for some time. According to a report from the Soma County Sheriff's Office at around 400 p.m. on December
28th, the two young men named Glenn Frost and David Broner stumbled upon the skeletal remains of at least two
victims. The bodies were located down a steep embankment. The furthest one down is approximately 66 feet off of the east
side of that road. So to paint this picture a little bit more, we have one skull and rib cage found together at
least 50 ft from the road and a second skull further down the embankment and to the right. Near that we have another rib
cage just under some brush. Who they were was anyone's guess. By the time the sheriff's office was at the site and due
to the time of year, it was getting dark and getting dark fast. The terrain is steep in many places, especially at this
location. So, the area was roped off and guarded till morning time. There were bones and teeth scattered in this
general area as well, plus some portions of remains belonging to deer, ultimately
finding three deer skulls in this area. So as of that night, they were not sure how many sets of human remains that they
would recover. The next day at dawn, we have a fullon search of this area. This means grid collection and even digging
in some spots. On this day of searching, of course, they will be fielding questions about this discovery, but
unable to answer them due to the obvious. We are finding skulls, rib cages, teeth, and bones, not complete
bodies. So, they have been there a considerable amount of time that allowed for full decomposition.
It's far too early to be able to say with any real confidence who the victims may be. It is suspected immediately that
they are homicide victims placed there, tossed there. They could not say the victim's ages, gender, or ethnicity
because they did not know and would not know until the identification process is
successful and complete. They could not say with any level of certainty how long
the bodies had been there and if they were placed there at the same time, resting there for the same amount of
time. But there is good reasoning for the questions that the reporters from the local news outlets are peppering the
sheriff's office with. Questions like were the victims men or women or one of each or kids and so on because we have
two missing girls from that area. In fact, these girls had vanished late one Friday night months ago, but only about
10 to 15 miles away. And that is where and when many believe that this true crime story starts. So, Captain, we're
going to go back to February 4th, 1972, more than 10 months prior to finding the
skulls and bones down that ravine in the hills of France Valley Road. We have Yavon Weber, age 13, and Moren Sterling,
age 12. These two are spending a Friday evening at the Redwood Empire Ice Arena.
This ice skating and recreational arena was built by Charles M. Scholes, the creator of Peanuts. You know, Snoopy,
Charlie Brown, and don't forget about my boy Lionus. Lionus Vanpelt. The rink built in 1969 is a popular spot
for many folks, but especially for teenagers. Marine's mother, Arlene, dropped them
off between 7 and 7:30 that evening. The plan, she would be returning to pick them up at 11:00 p.m.
Around 900 p.m., the two tell a friend that they are going off to smoke some pot with a man that they had met earlier
that night. They according to this friend, this witness, they say they met this man earlier that night in the lobby
of that arena. The witness described the man who had been watching the skaters as
tall and slender, Caucasian, but someone that the witness had never seen before.
Reports from other witnesses indicated that the girls had gone off to meet someone at a bowling alley, presumably
hitchhiking to get there. The pair, it's reported time and time again, Captain, that the pair were last seen getting
into a vehicle on Gville Road, which is right outside of the arena. So, when the
mother returns to pick the girls up at 11:00 p.m., she's watching people filter out of the arena. I'm guessing that's
closing time for them, looking for the faces of her daughter and daughter's friend in the crowd. Doesn't see him.
And sadly, she never is able to collect the girls and return them home that night. And
shortly after the girls were reported missing. >> Yeah, it's really scary to think as a
child we grew up in the 80s. So places like bowling alleys or or Skate America, they don't have security video. So how
many creeps were just going there on the weekend watching kids and looking for opportunities? So, the girls are
reported missing here, and there are several different reports on this that they were reported missing by their
parents on Sunday. Some reports say that it was Saturday. I do want to point out
here though, the pickup time was 11:00 p.m. on Friday. So, 12:01 a.m. on Saturday would technically be
Saturday. Less than, you know, less than an hour after mom gives up hope, hoping
to find the girls at the arena. These were good kids. So, it was completely out of
character for them to not be where they said they would be or at least as far as
their parents knew. After the girls were reported missing, police questioned classmates and friends, but they were
not able to develop any really good leads. The police believed that the girls were runaways
and stated so publicly. and the police's investigation stalled. >> The old brilliant runaway theory.
>> Yes. You see this throughout the decade of the 70s and a lot really with teenagers up until this started to
change sometime in the 80s and then really morphed into something different in the '9s, especially after the genesis
of the Amber Alert. Yeah, it makes maybe some sense if the individuals were in their late teens, early 20s, but we have
a 13 and 14y old, not individuals that normally run away to start a new life. Yeah, 13 and 12 years old here, Captain.
But w what we have here is the witness that was talking with the girls that night at the arena did say that they
dressed and carried themselves to be to appear older. So whatever happened to them, we might
want to factor that into the equation. >> Yeah. When you're 12 and 13, especially
young girls, you want to appear older, more mature. You like it when somebody says, "Oh, what are you, 15, 16?" You
must get a kick out of it. Yeah. Yeah. I'm I appear older than I am. There were rumors that the girls might have
previously been in contact with a man who lived along the Russian River, but police could not confirm that connection
either. A lot of suspicion here. I want to talk about where some of these details come from, the suspicions or the
the leads that ultimately didn't go anywhere, but they should be discussed and examined, and they were examined by
the police at the time. So, while they're saying that we believe that the girls are runaways early in this
investigation, that's the conversations that they're having with the parents behind closed doors, but they clearly
were doing some investigating because it was after. So, they take the missing person's report regardless of whether it
was Saturday or Sunday. The police, the detectives are at the girl's school. They go to the same middle school. So,
they're at the girls school that week talking to everybody that knew them, teachers and such, trying to figure out
did the girls tell anybody where they might be going. Whether it was that they plan to run away, plan to go somewhere
just to hang out or talked about somebody they had been hanging out with that was not a classmate or someone of
their age. Of course, police are going to want to talk to that individual or those individuals. Based off of that, it
appears to me that some of this information is coming from talking to those other children at that middle
school. This they were in contact with the man who lived along the Russian River. Again, police could not confirm
or make a real connection there. I'm what I'm guessing here with that lead, Captain is that that lead didn't come
didn't provide a name or identity for the man who lived along the Russian River.
>> And do we know if this contact was outside of the skating rink or was it just they made contact with this man at
the skating rink, but do we have any evidence that they were in communication with this individual before attending
the skating rink? >> No. So I we we need to try to separate these different leads here. So the
Russian River man is one lead. The bowling alley, we're going to a bowling alley is another lead. And then the man
that was going to be smoking pot with them is another lead. So these are all separate and these are all leads that
police are going to get from different individuals at different times. The bowling alley lead, I can't confirm
where it came from. The man on the Russian River, I believe, came from talking to somebody after the fact the
following week when school was back in and police are at that school interviewing people looking for leads.
What I think that we should probably discuss here is look, I think you can easily discredit but also at the same
time add validity to some of these leads, the three that we've discussed. And I don't have any proof of this. I'm
just going off of reasonable thinking. Thinking about how teenagers act and their movements.
if they were going to the ice skating rink simply as a disguise to the parents of, "Hey, drop us off here at this
friendly place that you know that we like to go that you feel comfortable, mom and dad, with us going off to." And
then we will go off to where we really want to go. Some place that we are not comfortable asking mom and dad that we
can go to, hanging out with people that we are not comfortable asking, getting permission to hang out with. That is a
very teenaglike behavior. Think about the timing. What is not in question is their friend telling police, you know,
around 9:00 p.m. the two came up to me, asked me if I wanted to go with them. They're going with this guy to go smoke
some pot. She didn't seem to think it was a big deal. I think she thought they were coming back. We don't know the
exact discussion that they had, but the friend says, "No, I'm I don't want to go
off with you guys. Guys, I'm going to stay right here. I'm going to go skating. >> Yeah, it's reasonable to It's reasonable
that this individual just assume they're going to the parking lot to smoke some pot and and this guy's car and they're
coming right back. They don't have a vehicle. So, it's if they leave, they're going to be dependent on this individual
to take them away and then bring them back. >> And she says she had seen the man
earlier. He was a guy that was watching the skaters. just somebody that was kind
of hanging out in the lobby area of the arena, which wouldn't be terribly uncommon. You would see a probably a
good amount of people hanging out between skate sessions or or people parents there that are just with their
kids and so on. But what I'm the where I think that we might be able to take away from some of
the credibility of these leads is again just back to simple teenager behavior, right? If if mom and dad are dropping us
off and our plan is to go off someplace else to the Russian River or to a bowling alley,
>> right? We would do that pretty quickly in the evening knowing that our ride is
coming back to retrieve us at 11:00 p.m. and we got to go there, have as much fun
as we can, and get our asses back to get picked up at 11:00 p.m. So, with this conversation taking place at 900 p.m., I
feel like your best lead, if you have to prioritize them, is probably this one of
the man that they are spotted with before they are no longer seen. This may tie in with the sighting of them on
Gville Road, presumably hitchhiking, because there is that statement of they were last seen getting into a vehicle on
Gville Road, which is very nearby. Regardless, December 28th, 1972, over 10 months later, skeletal remains
are discovered. We talked about how they were discovered. This turns out to be the site of where Yavon and Marine's
remains were ultimately found. It was eventually confirmed that the two missing were the two deceased. They
confirmed this via dental records. The victim's bodies were too decomposed for the coroner to determine their cause of
death. The evidence found at that scene is just like the evidence from where they were last seen. It's minimal.
>> Right. So besides the bones, the only evidence at the scene was a gold chain necklace with a cross, a single gold
earring, and some orange beads. No clothing, no personal belongings other than this jewelry confirmed by one of
the mothers as belonging to her daughter. Nearby, bushes contain some materials that could have been used to
bind the victims before their deaths. The two middle school friends, Yavon Lisa Weber and Marine Louise Sterling,
are considered to be the very first confirmed victims of the Santa Rosa hitchhiker murders case. Yavon's
stepfather was very blunt with the media and for folks paying attention to the news. His name is David Harrington. When
interviewed after the positive identification, he said that all along the Santa Rosa police insisted the two
girls were runaways. It is obvious that they weren't. He said the girls may have
been hitchhiking and added, "I hope other girls will learn by this and not hitchhike."
>> Yeah, this idea by law enforcement to me is either lazy or stupid. >> It's also a sign of the times. Yavon had
three siblings and Morin had a sister. As for some crime trends and crime statistics,
of course, the deaths were determined to be a foul play. This marked the 20th and
21st homicide victims of 1972 of the 1972 calendar year, and that was unfortunately a new high for Soma
County. The previous record was nine. So more than double. Yes, this is determined in December near the end of
the year. But also, yes, it also needs to be determined that we have a problem here.
[Music] [Music] Most people think that home security is just an alarm that goes off after a
break-in happens, scaring off the intruder, getting neighbors attention if you're lucky. But that's a reactive
approach. By the time an intruder is in your home, it is way too late. That's why you should trust Simply Safe. Their
system is designed to be proactive. They use smart AI powered cameras to identify
threats lurking outside of your home and immediately alert Simply Safe's professional monitoring agents. They
access two-way audio to confront the person, letting them know that they are being recorded, trigger sirens,
spotlights to scare them off, and request rapid police dispatch when needed. All helping to stop the
break-in, stop the intruder while they are still outside of your home. That's the key. I love Simply Safe. I've been
telling you about them for years. They're a fantastic security system for your home, for your business, for your
office. Whatever property that you want to secure and know that it's Simply Safe, you want to use the power of
Simplysafe. They're a better system at a better price. Visit simplysafe.com/g to claim 50% off a new system. That's
simplysafe.com/g. There's no safe like Simplysafe. TV's number one drama, High Potential,
returns with star Caitlyn Olsen as the crimesolving single mom with an IQ of 160. Every week, Morgan uses her
unconventional style and brilliance to crack LAPD's most perplexing cases. It's the perfect blend of humor and mystery.
She's breaking the mold without breaking a nail. New episodes of High Potential Tuesdays 10:9 central on ABC and stream
on Hulu. Hey, it's Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile. Now, I was looking for fun ways
to tell you that Mint's offer of unlimited premium wireless for $15 a month is back. So, I thought it would be
fun if we made $15 bills, but it turns out that's very illegal. Uh, so there goes my big idea for the commercial.
Give it a try at mintmobile.com/switch. >> Upront payment of $45 for 3 month plan
equivalent to $15 per month required. New customer offer for first three months only. Speed slow after 35 GB of
networks busy. Taxes and fees extra. Mintmobile.com. >> Cooler temps are rolling in and as
always, Quint is where you should be turning for fall staples that actually last. From cashmere to denim to boots,
the quality holds up and the price will blow you away. Quint has the kind of fall staples you'll wear non-stop, like
super soft 100% Mongolian cashmere sweaters starting at just $60. Their denim is durable and fits right. And
their real leather jackets bring that clean, classic edge. What makes Quint different? They partner directly with
ethical factories and skip the middlemen, so you get top tier fabrics and craftsmanship at half the price of
similar brands. Quint.com has become my go-to for filling my closet with incredibly awesome clothes that I will
wear about town when I go out to see my friends or do anything at all. I love quint.com. In fact, I was just shopping
their back in stock tab. This is those great items that everybody loves so much that they sold out and now they're back.
They got beanies are back. Zip up hoodies back. Heavyweight fleece hoodies are back. And they have a bundle tab,
too. You can bundle some of your favorite items together and save some more money. Winwinwin. I'm gearing up
for fall with quint.com. Keep it classic and cozy this fall cool with long lasting staples from Quint. Go
to quint.com/g for free shipping on your order and 365day returns. That's qui.com/g.
Free shipping and 365day returns. quint.com/g. All right, we are back. Talk hands in
the air. Cheers to you and cheers to you, Colonel. >> Cheers to you, Captain. Cheers to all
the people in the back. We are going to start getting into a series of events all taking place after
Yavon and Moren went missing and most taking place before they are found and eventually identified.
So please listen, identify and make note of the similarities regarding things like victimology, evidence, methodology,
and in some cases perhaps signature as we go. The next part of the story, Captain, it's another girl gone missing.
We have Kim Wendy Allen. She was born on July 22nd, 1956. Kim was studying art at
Santa Rosa Junior College at the time of her disappearance. She has been described by friends as a unique soul,
very principled, but also private and somewhat difficult to get close to. Regardless, Kim was open and
enthusiastic about sharing her interest with others, especially those close to her. An eager learner, she was receptive
to teaching of all kinds, and one teacher described her as having an aura of innocence about her. In high school,
she had served as a spirit leader for her senior class. Kim was a genuine person who believed
people were inherently good, and she trusted in people's kindness and decency. Kim's usual mode of
transportation, however, was her thumb, and she truly did not believe that she was at risk of any danger while
hitchhiking. Her mother as well as several of her teachers tried to warn her about the dangers of catching rides
with strangers. On March 4th, 1972, 19-year-old Kim Allen thumbmed a ride from her job. This is in Larkur,
California, where she worked at the natural food store. So, she caught a ride with two
men who agreed to take her part of the way back to her school in Santa Rosa. They were unable to take her all of the
way to her destination. They dropped her off down the road at the Bella Avenue entrance to Highway 101. This is
northbound in San Raphael, about 15 miles from where they had picked her up. So, they give her a short ride, 15 miles
or so. The men said they had dropped her off around 5:20 p.m. that evening, and that the young
woman had planned to hitchhike the rest of the way back to her school. The art student had been carrying a large wooden
soy sauce barrel, 2 feet high and a foot wide across the top and open on one end.
Imprinted on the barrel were red Chinese characters. So this is a very unique and
descriptive item that she had in her possession at this time. >> Absolutely. >> And as we mentioned, she's an art
student, very creative. She was planning on creating a drum with it, but of course we know that she vanished.
>> Well, and if hitchhiking seems bizarre to you or seems like something that you
I mean, for the longest time when we started covering cases like this, I had a hard time wrapping my head around like
hitchhiking was a normal thing. Talk to anybody that grew up in the the ' 60s and the ' 70s and they'll tell you just
how common it was. Not Not only it might have been common in in their life to actually hitchhike, but the amount of
individuals I've talked to where they're like, "Oh, yeah, you know, I used to pick up people all the time." was just a
thing that we did. >> Yeah. And we've talked about that in many cases that we've covered from this
era and also talked about hitchhiking at length in the trailer at today at the top of today's show. The afternoon of
the following day. So now we're at Sunday, March 5th. The nude body of a woman was found at the base of a steep
20ft embankment on the north side of Enterprise Road. 8/10en of a mile from the intersection with Bennett Valley
Road. The victim was found by two high school students taking a shortcut through the woods. Marks on her wrist
and ankles indicated that she had been bound at the hands and feet as if she had been spread eagled or perhaps even
hog tied. There was also a wound on her left collar bone, but it was not considered to be a fatal wound. She had
been strangled with some type of cord or possibly wire. And the only evidence remaining at the scene was a single gold
hoop earring. The pathologist's report confirmed that the young woman had died around midnight on Saturday. This hours
before just hours before the body was discovered. Sonoma County Coroner Andrew Johansson said she had been tortured to
death and she was slowly and deliberately strangled, taking at least a half an hour to die. The cause of
death was listed as exfixiation, and the autopsy revealed she had been raped. The
medical examiner was able to collect semen from her body. And she also had an oily substance on the right side of her
body that authorities said was similar to the oil used in a machine shop to assist in cutting metal. If you have
large saws, even even a chainsaw that you would use outside to take down a tree to fell some trees requires oil to
keep it going. >> So, at this scene, they don't find any clothes either. >> Correct. Yeah. No clothes. According to
at least one source, police speculated that the single gold hoop earring that was found at the scene could possibly
have belonged to the killer. I'm guessing here that when they show this to people that knew her, nobody was able
to confirm that it belonged to her. So, detectives are taking a guess here, like
she's found with it. Could it be that it was placed there by somebody else or or
did it belong to her? Difficult to say. Investigators also discovered an impression, possibly that of a leg in
the soil at the top of the embankment about a foot long and 14 in deep. So, at first I thought, you know, this is
probably a whole lot of nothing. But then when I found sources saying 14 in deep, this is probably something here.
So, law enforcement looking at this, they theorized and they they publicly talked about finding this. They
theorized that this hole possibly could have been made by the killer, somebody that was getting rid of the body, the
killer slipping and falling as he attempted to dump the body. Moreover, the angle of the impression led them to
believe he may have actually seriously injured himself and may have even required medical treatment.
That's why they're openly publicly talking about this very specific detailed item found at the crime scene
because if he did if this person did require medical treatment, they want to talk to a medical facility or medical
facility personnel and find out, hey, did did you treat anybody recently that came in with this type of injury? I
don't know how quickly they were releasing this to the public because this is this is one of those items,
right, that I have to believe that if you got a whole bunch of good detectives working together on this, whose call is
this? Because I could see one side of the argument being we got to get this out to the public because if somebody
sought medical treatment, that's our lead. That's probably our guy. Now, we know who we need to talk to. But
remember the between abduction and when the body is found is like 24 hours, >> right?
>> If you put this out too early, maybe the person that is responsible or persons responsible hears this and
says, "No, no, no. Not so fast, mister. We can't go get medical attention now. I
can I can wrap it up here and try to walk it off or I can drive a great or good distance away and seek
medical attention there and hope that the dots are not connected. So that this is one of those details it's like you
need to get it out, but what is the perfect timing of getting that detail out? >> But already we're seeing similarities
between this victim and the first two victims. quite a bit of similarities. However, keep in mind because we started
with the finding of those first two victims. The finding was 10 months after they vanished. So, at this time, what
they have in Santa Rosa basically is we got two missing kids. We have no idea where they are. We're leaning toward
Runaway. And then about a month later, slightly more, well actually one day more than a
month, 30 days because February is a short month. It was a leap year that year. 30 days later, we're finding the
body of this college student. It would take some time though. So maybe that required medical treatment detail
came out after the identification. So they didn't positively and publicly state that they had identified the body
until March 9th and the body was found on the 5th. So 4 days earlier. The remains were posit 4 days later. I'm
sorry. My problem with the first case though is that we have eyewitnesses putting them at the skate rink and we
have really uh we have people assuming that they saw two girls hitchhiking and we have no clue if those were the
same girls or not. It's just speculation. And like we said there was >> this was common practice for people to
hitchhike. So it it's very possible it was just two different girls hitchhiking. And that that's really I I
like that you point that out because so that tip was a potential eyewitness tip that came in after the police had
reached out to the public saying, "Hey, we got these two missing girls, these two missing kids from the skating rink,
this arena. Did anybody see anything?" and some a man came forward saying he was driving in the area and he he saw
two girls matching their description getting into a vehicle. Some of the reports say presumably
hitchhiking. I I couldn't find a report that outwardly said like I saw them thumb in the air. And so you're hitting
on something that I think is key. It could be any couple of girls hitchhiking. It could also be any couple
of girls just getting into a vehicle, >> right? We don't have a lot of details of
of the actual event. >> If I'm looking for one lead, if you tell me I only get one lead to anchor my
investigation to, my one lead is going to be the man that approaches some kids that their friend says, "I've never seen
that guy before. He was older than us and he wanted to smoke pot with them." That's the one I'm anchoring my
investigation to. >> Well, I think something that's interesting is you were talking about
this oily substance that they find at the second crime scene >> and that actually makes my mind go to
bowling alley. >> Well, yeah. Any form of oil. And I don't know. I would like to see the
particulars on on how they narrowed that down because I've seen some other reports, Captain, that state that it
would also be something that they would consider to have been found likely to have been found in a mechanic
shop, you know, working on cars or vehicles. >> Yeah. Or maybe a young man that works at
the bowling alley that fixes >> maybe their understanding of this. Uh Yeah. And that would go back to the the
thought that the two girls were going to go off to a bowling alley. And unfortunately, their remains, the state
they were found in, were too far gone to pull such of a such substance off of their bodies.
>> Yeah. Cuz anybody that has been bowling often, you you come away feeling a little greasy.
>> Oh, yeah. You're greasy. You're dirty. >> Playing with your balls and you're a
little greasy. >> I also think of a couple things here. because there is such a quick turnaround
between the likely abduction time with Kim Wendy Allen and when her body is then found. So if she was strangled with
some type of cord and marks on her wrist and ankles indicating that she had been bound at
the hands and feet as if she had been spread eagled or perhaps hog tied. So, if she were moved elsewhere,
you know what kind of location you might be looking for. It could be as simple as
it's oil or grease off of the garage of someone's home. But it also could be a working garage
or it could also be as simple as she was picked up in a van. Somebody had it was a utility van,
>> right? somebody had oil or something that had been previously spilled or was still in the vehicle at that time. So,
while it is helpful to the investigation, it really the possibilities are still pretty wide
open with that detail. But interesting that you point out the the bowling alley angle. So on the afternoon of March 9th,
1972, the remains of Kendy of Kim Wendy Allen were positively identified, making
her actually the first victim whose body was recovered in the Santa Rosa hitchhiker murders killings.
In addition to the large soy barrel she had been toing, she had also been carrying an orange aluminum frame
backpack, which would be found several weeks after her murder. When last seen, Kim had been wearing a
floral ankle length blue skirt over blue jeans, a gold barret, and carrying a blue straw bag. She was also wearing an
oval turquoise stone ring in a silver setting and had a shoulder purse. The Press Democrat, the local newspaper
there, reported that she had been wearing a 24-in necklace made of seashells and other natural materials.
So th this young woman, this lady, she had style. I mean, you can hear it right there. The
what I find very interesting though is she's a young adult, but it's so specific on what was on her person or
with her when she went missing. And it would be easy if all those items were recovered with her, but they weren't. So
that's where I go back to this earring. They're not openly saying it, but if you
can have someone or someone ones that are telling you, look, I can name 10 items that she was wearing that day. Oh,
I don't recognize that earring. That's where you start to was that planted there by the person responsible for her
abduction. But also one of the things because the question that we're going to have to get to are there's similarities
in these cases, but there's similarities in a lot of murder cases. Are these cases actually connected?
And one of the speculations that somebody might go, "Well, Captain, you're going a little too far here." But
if you did abduct these girls from the skate rink and then you hear this speculation of, "Oh, well, maybe they
were hitchhiking," that could give this killer another option, right? Like, "Oh,
well, I don't I don't have to meet them at the bowling alley or the skating rink
or wherever and this public location because I could be identified." And maybe I was identified, but I was
identified by one of their peers. So, law enforcement doesn't have a lot of information on me. But there's
speculation that these girls were hitchhiking. Oh, well, maybe that will be my ruse. Each one of these cases,
let's try to separate them because we got several more to get to and through. But when you separate them, I have
problems with each case. And I'll try to continue to go through those. My problem
with the first case of the the two young girls again is simply the man at the arena. He stands out, right? In this
case, so we have some more details here. All right. Those weren't the only items
that were known to be in her possession or on her person when she went missing. So, she also had a two checks in her
possession and a charge card from a Santa Rosa department store. Of course, these items not found as well. One of
the checks was a $150 check from her father and the other in the amount of $56.28.
This is from her part-time job at the Lockpurer Natural Food Store. So that is a whole heck of a lot of personal
belongings, clothing, accessories, and >> and such missing from the person and not
found with her or around her at the scene. And she's found within 24 hours, very likely less than when she was last
seen. Now, this is where the story gets a little more strange and weird. So on March 24th,
20 days after she goes missing, Kim's personal checkbook was deposited into a drive up mailbox across the street from
a post office. This in Kentfield, California. The checkbook, which had been deposited
into the mailbox, they know it was dropped there between 6:00 a.m. and 12:05 p.m. that day. It contained two
fingerprints which police initially thought could possibly have belonged to her killer and were hoping it would lead
them to such. >> Right. This is a somewhat weird location. So, it's about 40 miles from
her destination where she was trying to get to via hitchhiking that day. Depending on what route, this is either
a 40inut drive to about 1 hour drive time away. This is very close to Larkspur, which is where she worked.
This is why I have a big issue with this. Okay, now mind you, whoever dropped this in the mailbox, it could
just be a concerned citizen, a nice person, right? It has the checks would have her address on them or at least the
address of the bank. You find this, you don't just want it lying around. It's the 70s. Writing bad checks is easy
peasy back then, baby. Um, if I were alive in the 70s, I'd be living off of bad checks. Somebody drops it in the
mailbox and it gets returned. And what's cool is they can determine exactly what
day and roughly what time period that had to have been. So, I don't think that it was some good Samaritan that dropped
this in the mailbox because you have this missing person. You have them publicly openly asking for information
about her. You would think that the person would take the time to notice that, you know, the name on the
checkbook, the address on the check, something that they would, even if they dropped it in and didn't figure it out
at the time that they would later call and say, "Hey, I was the Jane or the John that found this checkbook and I was
the one that dropped it in there." That never happens. What we do know is between the time that she's abducted and
later discarded of, sorry for the terminology here, no nice way of saying it, a lot of the items that were in her
possession, poof, gone. So, it would stand a reason that the abductor/killer was the one that dropped it in this
mailbox 20 days later, 19 days after she's found. What's interesting is the killer, we know she had in her
possession a check from her work. So, he would also, without her telling her or anything at all, he could just simply
look at that check and go, "Oh, I know where my victim worked." So, I'll drive to a location that's near there and
choose a one of those mailboxes. I point that out because I also think the two men that she hitched a ride from
prior to them dropping her off 15 miles north, I find their story a little problematic, right? I mean, who's to say
they didn't kill her, >> right? >> So, the stories out there regarding these men, I couldn't find their names.
The only thing I could find, the only details about these men were A, where they say they picked her up. We know
what time she got off work that day. B, approximately where they said they dropped her off that that Bella Avenue
near the on-ramp to the 101. The stories out there, Captain, are that they passed
the poly that they were given a polygraph examination, they passed it, and they were cleared of any wrongdoing.
There's a lot of other versions of that story that say that one of the two men was given a polygraph examination and he
passed and they were cleared of any wrongdoing. >> So maybe the other one didn't pass
>> or or they never gave the other guy. He didn't consent to it. >> Well, the nice thing about killing
somebody with another person is you have a built-in alibi. >> Yes. So what what I'm getting at here is
you're you're knocking on the door of what I'm getting at is alibi. I don't want to hear that you cleared them.
We've tal anybody that's listened to this show for a year or more knows that we have discussed the the problems with
clearing somebody just using a polygraph. So, we don't need to go down that road. What I want to hear is that
no, we cleared them because minutes after they said they dropped them off, these two guys were here and there and
we have all these people to place them there and they were there for this amount of time. That's not what we're
getting. We're getting no after the fact that at least one of them was given a polygraph exam and they passed and so we
cleared them. This could be as equally irresponsible as thinking that two girls 12 and 13 ran away. Well, lazy or
stupid, right? If I'm law enforcement, it's going to take a hell of a lot a hell of a lot for me to clear anybody. I
mean, even the family, they're going to go, "Well, have you ruled out the family
yet?" I go, "Everybody's on the table." >> Mhm. >> You work for the victim, not for the
victim's family, not for the public. You work for the victim. I loved when we talked to the one detective, one of
many, but a detective working a case that's still unsolved to this day, a New York case. I asked him, I said, "You
know, after walking into the scene, did you immediately have any suspects?" He goes, "Hell yeah, we did." He goes,
"When I arrived to a crime scene, everybody but my mother is a is a suspect." >> Everybody but himself and his mother.
Yeah. >> He only cleared his mother at that time. He only cleared his mother at that time.
One thing I found interesting though, the disappearance dates here, February 4th for the two girls, March 4th for
Kim. I at first I was thinking it wasn't just the same date, but the same day of
the week. However, that year was a leap year as I said earlier. So, the days of the week differ by a day. February 4th
was a Friday when the two girls were abduction abducted and March 4th was a Saturday abduction. Yeah, but it makes
sense because a young individual looking to do stuff, looking to get out, looking
to meet up friends are more likely to hitchhike on the weekend. Something else here, Captain, that is intriguing. We
mentioned that deep leg slashfoot impression at this scene with police even openly discussing with the public
that hey the the perpetrator or one of the perpetrators may have been injured when placing the body where we found it
based off of this hole or the impression 14 in deep. When we fast forward to December of 72 at the double dump scene
off of France Valley Road, they reported that there were holes there. Now, at no
time do they ever say that they they were similar in nature to the one found at the scene for Kim Allen. They just
simply described them as holes. But I thought this to be quite interesting. As vague as a description as that is, it is
something that is not entirely dissimilar from something found at this other scene.
[Music] Want to thank you so much for joining us here in the garage. So much more to get
to. Stick around for part two. Until then, be good, be kind, and don't litter. [Music]
[Applause] [Music]

Santa Rosa Murders ////// Missing Girls

Part 1 of 4

www.TrueCrimeCrime.com (http://www.truecrimecrime.com/)

The Santa Rosa Hitchhiker Murders is a series of unsolved homicides of young women that took place in the early 1970s. Many of the victims were confirmed or believed to have been hitchhiking in or around the Santa Rosa, California area. High School girls and College students were not safe. Often times the women and girls were not found until several days later. Many discovered in rural areas. If you have any information regarding these cases please submit a tip at sheriff-coldcase@sonoma-county.org or please call the Sonoma County Sheriff’s cold case unit at 1707-565-2727

Beer of the Week - Saddle Bronc by Black Tooth Brewing Company

Garage Grade 3 and 3 quarter bottle caps out of 5

For everything Garage True Crime go to www.TrueCrimeGarage.com (http://www.truecrimegarage.com/)

We have an insider show that can be found on Patreon and Apple subscriptions. The show is called "Off The Record.” Join us if you are NASTY! There you will get dozens of episodes of Off The Record plus a couple of Bonus episodes and our first 50 shows.

True Crime Garage merchandise is available on our website’s store page. Plus get True Crime Garage Pod art that you can post on your socials on our Media page.

Follow the show on X and Insta @TrueCrimeGarage / Follow Nic on X @TCGNIC / Follow The Captain on X @TCGCaptain

Thanks for listening and thanks for telling a friend. Be good, be kind, and don’t litter!

Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com (https://pcm.adswizz.com) for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Brief Summary

The episode covers the Santa Rosa Hitchhiker murders, detailing the disappearances and deaths of young women in the 1970s.

Key points

High Potential Returns. TV's number one drama, High Potential, features Caitlyn Olsen as a brilliant single mom.
The Dangers of Hitchhiking. Hitchhiking was once a common mode of transportation but is fraught with risks.
The Santa Rosa Hitchhiker Murders. A series of murders in the 1970s left a community in fear.
The First Confirmed Victims. Yavon and Marine are identified as the first confirmed victims of the Santa Rosa hitchhiker murders.
Kim Wendy Allen's Disappearance. Kim, a 19-year-old art student, disappears after hitchhiking from work.
Discovery of a Body. The nude body of a woman is found, leading to a grim investigation.

Episode highlights

Episode quotes

It could never happen to me.

Reflecting on the perceived safety of hitchhiking.

4:27WatchSep 23, 2025

Tension

75/ 100High tension

More from True Crime Garage TV

Solve the Crime

Read a real case one clue at a time, then see how your call held up against the investigators.